测试成绩 | |||
CineBench 2003 v1 |
3Rendering (Single CPU) |
255 CB-CPU | |
Shading(CINEMA 4D) |
305 CB-GFX | ||
Shading(OpenGL Software Lighting) |
1252 CB-GFX | ||
Shading(OpenGL Hardware Lighting) |
1537 CB-GFX | ||
OpenGL Speedup |
5.4 | ||
PCMark05 1.0.1 |
PCMark Score |
2568 | |
CPU Score |
2595 | ||
Memory Score |
3472 | ||
Graphics Score |
1313 | ||
HDD Score |
5357 | ||
SiSoftware Sandra 2005 SR2a |
CPU Arthmetic |
Dhrystone ALU |
7607 |
Whetstone FPU/SSE2 |
2856/3680 | ||
CPU Multi-Media |
Integer x16 iSSE2 |
17428 | |
Floating-Point x4 iSSE2 |
18553 | ||
File System |
Drive Index |
54 MB/s | |
Buffered Read |
158 MB/s | ||
Sequential Read |
61 MB/s | ||
Random Read |
44 MB/s | ||
Buffered Write |
147 MB/s | ||
Sequential Write |
61 MB/s | ||
Random Write |
45 MB/s | ||
Average Access Time |
7 ms(estimated) | ||
Memory Bandwidth |
Int Buff'd |
4990 MB/s | |
Float Buff'd |
4927 MB/s | ||
Super PI/Mod1.4 |
1M Calculation |
00m 47.515s | |
4M Calculation |
03m 54.000s | ||
EVEREST Home 2.20.405 |
Memory Read |
4981MB/s | |
Memory Write |
1512 MB/s | ||
Memory Latency |
54.6 ns | ||
HD Tach 3.0.1.0 |
Average Read |
55.0 MB/s | |
Random Access |
13.4 ms | ||
CPU Utilization |
4% (+/- 2%) | ||
Burst Speed |
166.8 MB/s | ||
3DMark 2001SE Build 330 |
3DMark Score |
5305 | |
3DMark03 3.60 |
3DMark Score |
1319 | |
GT1 - Wings of Fury |
57.1 fps | ||
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon |
6.2 fps | ||
GT3 - Troll's Lair |
5.9 fps | ||
GT4 - Mother Nature |
10.3 fps | ||
CPU Score |
599 | ||
CPU Test 1 |
67.9 fps | ||
CPU Test 2 |
10.5 fps | ||
3DMark05 1.2.0 |
3DMark Score |
638 | |
GT1 - Return To Proxycon |
2.9 fps | ||
GT2 - Firefly Forest |
2.0 fps | ||
GT3 - Canyon Flight |
3.0 fps | ||
CPU Score |
3591 | ||
CPU Test 1 |
1.7 fps | ||
CPU Test 2 |
3.3 fps |
由于测试使用的Athlon 64 3000+频率要比Sempron 3000+的低11%,因此在不少CPU相关测试项目中不如上次测试的C51,但是内存带宽和图形性能却是大大胜出,图形性能高出20%多,Socket 939平台性能果然不错。