整合新军 两款C51主板评测
|
测试项目 |
ASROCK K8NF4G-SATA2 |
BIOSTAR TForce 6100 | |
|
CineBench 2003 v1 | |||
|
Rendering (Single CPU) |
284 CB-CPU |
280 CB-CPU | |
|
Shading (CINEMA 4D) |
328 CB-GFX |
316 CB-GFX | |
|
Shading (OpenGL Software Lighting) |
1199 CB-GFX |
1048 CB-GFX | |
|
Shading (OpenGL Hardware Lighting) |
1337 CB-GFX |
1119 CB-GFX | |
|
OpenGL Speedup |
4.08 |
3.54 | |
|
Super PI /mod 1.4 | |||
|
1M |
46.516s |
48.985s | |
|
2M |
3m48.094s |
04m01.484s | |
|
PCMark05 Basic 1.0.1 | |||
|
PCMark Score |
2490 |
2367 | |
|
CPU Score |
2851 |
2806 | |
|
Memory Score |
2929 |
2718 | |
|
Graphics Score |
1103 |
1002 | |
|
HDD Score |
5334 |
5365 | |
|
Sisoftware Sandra 2005 SR2a | |||
|
CPU Arithmetic Benchmark |
Dhrystone ALU Whetstone FPU/iSSE2 |
8448 |
8363 3160/4091 |
|
CPU Multi-Media Benchmark |
Integer x4 aEMMX/aSSE Floating-Point x4 iSSE2 |
19268 |
19077 20525 |
|
File System Benchmark |
Drive Index Buffered Read Sequential Read Random Read Buffered Write Sequential Write Random Write Average Access Time |
54 MB/s |
54 MB/s 158 MB/s 61 MB/s 44 MB/s 115 MB/s 61 MB/s 44 MB/s 7ms(estimated) |
|
Memory Banthwidth Benchmark |
Int Buff'd Float Buff'd |
2765 |
2406 2406 |
|
Everest Home Edition 2.20.405 | |||
|
Memory Read |
2777 |
2652 | |
|
Memory Write |
1166 |
1010 | |
|
Memory Latency |
70.4 |
70.5 | |
|
HD Tach 3.0.1.0 | |||
|
Average Read |
55.1 MB/s |
55.1 MB/s | |
|
Burst Speed |
166.7 MB/s |
166.8 MB/s | |
|
CPU Utilization |
4%(+/- 2%) |
5%(+/- 2%) | |
|
Random Access |
13.4ms |
13.4ms | |
|
3DMark2001 SE 330 | |||
|
3DMark Score |
4592 |
3869 | |
|
3DMark03 3.60 | |||
|
3DMark Score |
1153 |
986 | |
|
GT1 - Wings of Fury |
47.1 fps |
39.6 fps | |
|
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon |
5.3 fps |
4.4 fps | |
|
GT3 - Troll's Lair |
5.2 fps |
4.4 fps | |
|
GT4 - Mother Nature |
9.6 fps |
8.5 fps | |
|
CPU Score |
523 |
455 | |
|
CPU Test 1 |
58.6 fps |
50.7 fps | |
|
CPU Test 2 |
9.3 fps |
8.1 fps | |
|
3DMark05 1.2.0 | |||
|
3DMark Score |
596 |
525 | |
|
GT1 - Return To Proxycon |
2.6 fps |
2.3 fps | |
|
GT2 - Firefly Forest |
1.9 fps |
1.7 fps | |
|
GT3 - Canyon Flight |
2.7 fps |
2.4 fps | |
|
CPU Score |
3426 |
2979 | |
|
CPU Test 1 |
1.8 fps |
1.5 fps | |
|
CPU Test 1 |
2.9 fps |
2.6 fps | |
显然偷步行为让ASROCK K8NF4G-SATA2的性能要比BIOSTAR TForce 6100要高，特别是内存得分和图形得分。PCMark05的内存得分K8NF4G-SATA2要高7.7%，Sisoftware的内存测试则高出4.7%。这跟K8NF4G-SATA2较高的频率有关，跟内存时序也有关。
因为Socket 754的内存为单通道，并且集成图形核心共享系统内存，因而同样要占用内存带宽，导致了k8NF4G-SATA2的3DMark2001 SE得分要比BIOSTAR TForce 6100要高18.7%，3DMark03和3DMark05是16.9%。这一定程度上表现了ASROCK的设计功力。
0
相关文章
关注我们
